Compare / Feeld
Feeld review
Affiliate disclosure: some links to dating platforms on SluttyGirls.now may earn us a commission if you sign up or pay. It never costs you more, and no platform pays to be listed or to change what we write. How we rate
Good for: Threesomes, open relationships, kink and couples, with real verification.
Skip it if: You want anonymous one-tap hookups and won't fill in a profile.
Visit FeeldFeeld is the closest thing to a hookup app that grown-ups actually like using. People list their desires up front (casual, group, kink, "exploring"), so there's no awkward guessing about whether she's here for the same thing you are.
The real-user signals are the best in this list: optional photo verification run by Veriff (a live selfie matched to her photos), and no regulator findings about fake profiles that we could find. Explicit images in chat are blurred until you tap to see them, which is a feature: it means the women who stay are the ones who chose to.
Price is honest: free, or Majestic at $29.99 for 30 days on the US App Store. A complete profile, verified photos and actual manners are what get replies.
The facts
- Cost
- Free to use. Majestic is the only paid tier: $29.99 for 30 days, $49.99 for 90 days or $149.99 a year on the US App Store.[1][2]
- Who uses it
- Feeld publishes no audited user numbers; the figures quoted in trade press come from a single source we could not confirm, so we don't repeat them. (Our own check: no published source found.)
- Verification & safety tools
- Optional photo verification: a live selfie matched to a profile photo by Veriff, no ID needed. Explicit images in chat are blurred until you choose to see them.[3][4][5]
- Privacy record
- We found no large Feeld data breach. Your desires and photos are visible to other members, so choose what you show. (Our own check: no published source found.)
- Bots, fakes & regulators
- We found no regulator action or credible investigation about fake profiles on this platform. That is not proof there are none: report anything that looks automated. (Our own check: no published source found.)